The case was filed shortly after Renee Good was fatally shot by an ICE agent and gained urgency after ICE fatally shot Alex Pretti on Saturday.
On Monday, a Minnesota federal judge heard arguments from Minnesota officials in their challenge to the Trump administration’s ongoing immigration crackdown in the state.
According to AP, U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez’s questions showed skepticism toward both Minnesota’s request to halt immigration enforcement in the state and the Trump administration’s tactics in its ongoing crackdown.
The lawsuit was filed days after ICE agent Jonathan Ross fatally shot Renee Good as she was trying to drive away. Menendez acknowledged that the case has renewed urgency after Alex Pretti was fatally shot on Saturday by another unidentified ICE agent.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
Menendez questioned the federal government’s true motive behind the immigration crackdown, focusing on a letter U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi recently sent to Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, demanding that the state turn over voter rolls, Medicaid, and SNAP records, and end sanctuary policies to “restore the rule of law” in Minnesota. “I mean, is there no limit to what the executive can do under the guise of enforcing immigration law?” Menendez asked.
“If this is not stopped right here, right now, I don’t think anybody who is seriously looking at this problem can have much faith in how our republic is going to go in the future,” Minnesota Assistant Attorney General Brian Carter said.
The Trump administration has tried to frame the lawsuit as “legally frivolous” and asked the judge to reject the request. “I don’t see how the fact that we’re also doing additional things that we are allowed to do, that the Constitution has vested us with doing, would in any way negate another piece of the same operation, the same surge,” Brantley Mayers, counsel to the Justice Department’s assistant attorney general, said during the hearing.
Menendez didn’t seem entirely convinced, questioning where the line is drawn between the executive enforcing the law and violating the Constitution. I know no one was asking me, but I think the line is drawn when federal law enforcement tactics explicitly violate the constitutional rights guaranteed to all of us.
For a party that has made free speech and gun rights a centerpiece of its modern identity, the killing of Alex Pretti while he was lawfully exercising his First and Second Amendment rights has had the GOP bending backward to justify it. ICE’s pattern of entering homes and conducting arrests without warrants is also violating the Fourth Amendment.