In a new procedural development, U.S. consular posts have started forwarding B-1 in lieu of H-1B visa applications to the Department of State (DOS)’s Visa Office in Washington, D.C., for final review and approval before issuance. This additional review step represents a more centralized approach to evaluating such applications and reflects growing attention to how this limited visa category is being used.
The B-1 in lieu of H-1B classification has traditionally allowed certain foreign professionals to perform short-term, professional assignments in the United States while remaining on the payroll of a foreign employer. The classification requires that the worker remain employed and paid abroad, that the salary or remuneration continue to come from a foreign source, and that the individual not enter the U.S. labor market through local employment or direct hire. The underlying principle is that work performed in the United States under this classification must have no impact on the U.S. labor market and must be incidental to the person’s ongoing foreign employment.
Following implementation of the $100,000 “Visa Integrity” fee for new H-1B petitions filed on or after Sept. 21, 2025, U.S. authorities are concerned that some employers may attempt to use the B-1 in lieu of H-1B route to avoid paying the new fee for individuals outside the United States. The concern is that beneficiaries might enter under this classification, then later file an H-1B change of status petition from within the United States, effectively bypassing both the fee and the intended H-1B screening process.
To address these concerns, DOS is now having consular posts refer B-1 in lieu of H-1B visa applications to the Visa Office in Washington, DC for final review. Consular officers will have to wait for the Visa Office to approve an application before issuing the visa stamp. The Visa Office will assess whether an application meets the narrow legal standards for the category and whether it appears to be an attempt to avoid H-1B program requirements or the new statutory fee.
As a result, applicants applying under this classification may anticipate longer processing times and closer scrutiny. Employers planning to send professionals to the United States for short-term work might evaluate whether the proposed activities fall within permissible B-1 business parameters or whether an H-1B petition (with full fee payment) is the appropriate route.
This change underscores the government’s focus on fee compliance and the proper use of visa classifications. Employers should consider taking the following steps:
While the B-1 in lieu of H-1B option remains available, it is now subject to a more rigorous level of oversight. Use of this already challenging classification should be used in very limited circumstances, and employers may wish to assess alternative immigration options where possible.
You are responsible for reading, understanding, and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free-to-use, no-log-in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates, or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys, or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.
Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.
Under certain state laws, the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.