Sports

US to tell partners to pick side in AI race with China

US to tell partners to pick side in AI race with China

Your digital subscription includes access to content from all our websites in your region.
Access unlimited content and the digital versions of our print editions - Today's Paper.

The US is preparing to tell dozens of ‌countries they must pick sides in the artificial intelligence race with China, warning they will be excluded from a US-led AI coalition if they also sign up for Beijing's competing framework, according to a US official ‌and an internal draft reviewed by Reuters.

Washington launched the Pax Silica initiative in 2025, aimed at securing supply chains for AI models, semiconductors and critical minerals amid a fierce technology rivalry with Beijing.

About two dozen countries have joined, including Kazakhstan, a key potential source of critical minerals that has also joined China's coalition, as well as close US allies such as Japan, Australia and South Korea.

The draft letter, prepared by the State Department, is addressed to the 35 signatories of a US "AI Opportunity Statement" signed in June, which includes members of the non-binding Pax Silica framework and other countries that have expressed a desire to align co-operation ‌on AI with Washington.

By ‌pressing countries to choose sides, ⁠the US hopes to starve China of resources in a race to make the most sophisticated AI, which could be used for ​military or economic dominance.

In July, Chinese President Xi Jinping launched a rival World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization, promoting his country's open-weight technology as a challenge to US influence over the fast-moving sector.

Kazakhstan is the only country so far known to have joined both initiatives, setting off alarm bells in Washington DC.

"To be part of everything is to be part of nothing. Signature of the Pax Silica Declaration is not merely a membership subscription, but a commitment," the letter says, urging countries to "choose deliberately" on AI.

"It cannot be held alongside membership in duplicative initiatives whose expectations conflict with our own," the letter said, without specifically mentioning China.